The xx win Mercury prize 2010
September 8, 2010 Filed under Uncategorized
(The Guardian)
Indie minimalists The xx take home coveted £20,000 Mercury prize for eponymous debut album

The xx receive their award on stage at the Mercury prize awards.
Ethereal indie minimalists The xx last night won the Barclaycard Mercury Prize and the £20,000 cash that goes with it for their eponymous debut album, beating 11 other acts.
It was a popular decision loudly welcomed by the great and good of the music industry who cheered loudly – and with genuine appreciation – as the group members took to the stage in the Grosvenor House hotel, in central London.
There was little air punching or exclamations of joy. Once on stage singer and guitarist Ollie Sim managed a breathless “wow”. He thanked the judges and the band’s record label: “We have had the most incredible year and it’s felt like every day we have woken up to something incredible that we were expecting.
“It’s felt a bit like a haze to us, being here has been a weird moment of clarity. It just means so much.”
Asked what the band would spend the prize money on Romy Madley Croft suggested it might go towards building their own studio, since their first album had been made in a converted basement the size of a bathroom. “We’re all very excited to make new music,” she said.
Martin Mills, founder and chairman of Beggars group, which houses the band said: ‘The xx is a perfect winner for the Mercurys – a completely fresh sound, which over time becomes an intimate friend.”
The reason the panel of judges chose this album could be distilled into one word, said chief of judges Simon Frith: “Atmosphere.”
He said the decision had not been easy but the panel had been wowed by the album. “It has the most amazing sense of mood and atmosphere and there is really nothing quite like it.” Thanks to a number of adverts and endorsements the album had imprinted itself on the public’s consciousness, he added. “It appears to have become like part of the soundscape in an almost invisible fashion. It also captures a sense of the uneasy times we live in. It’s a very urban record.”
The xx had been hotly tipped to win the award since being nominated back in July. Their album, released in August last year, was praised for its “lightness of touch at play that gives The xx a sophistication beyond their years” in the Observer.
The three-piece band from London who formed in 2005, met at Elliott School, notable for alumni including Hot Chip, Burial, The Maccabees and Four Tet.
Recorded, mainly at night, in the basement of the XL studios the melancholic, almost dream-like, album wowed critics when it was released, featuring highly in NME and Rolling Stone’s “best of the year” lists.
Released in August last year, The xx entered the chart at 36, slipping to 62 a week later. Showing that the Mercurys still have some power despite the naysayers which question its relevance, after the album’s nomination it jumped from 44 to 16 in the charts, quickly becoming the favourite to win the prize.
Rock veteran Paul Weller, despite being the late favourite to win after a sudden surge of bets on his album Wake Up the Nation, missed out along with nominees Wild Beasts, Laura Marling, I Am Kloot, Villagers, Foals, Dizzee Rascal, Mumford & Sons, Biffy Clyro and Corinne Bailey Rae and Kit Downes Trio.
Paul Stokes, associate editor of NME, said that based on pre-awards hype, there might have been a suggestion that the judges would opt for the obvious choice. “But let’s not forget this is an album made by self-confessed social outcasts, that merges the fringes of indie and dance culture. That it has become the favourite demonstrates this album’s true achievement.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/sep/08/the-xx-mercury-prize-2010
Mercury prize nominations: Brits are back on song
July 22, 2010 Filed under Uncategorized
(The Guardian)
After years in the shadow of Brooklyn bands, the British album is stronger than ever. Rosie Swash salutes a Mercury shortlist that reflects the boom in homegrown talent

Contenders for the Mercury prize … the xx at the Latitude festival.
Has there ever been a more maligned award than the Mercury music prize? The annual round of hand-wringing and what’s-it-for criticism began even before yesterday’s shortlist was announced – though, if anything, the dissenting voices have been a fair bit quieter since. Does this mean this year’s 12 album nominees are an unusually safe bet? Dizzee Rascal, the xx, Paul Weller: you could argue that the judges have managed to nod in every musical direction this island has to offer. Or, less cynically, you could say the range is a positive sign that British music is on fighting form, after a period of several years in which the US album has dominated the awards scene, as well as critics’ and readers’ polls.
In fact, the field has seemed even narrower than that: for the last couple of years it’s been largely Brooklyn exports who have swept the board. Last year brought wildly successful albums from Brooklyn-based Dirty Projectors, Brooklyn-based Grizzly Bear and Brooklyn/Baltimore-based Animal Collective. In 2008, the Guardian critics’ end of year poll for best album was topped by New Yorkers TV on the Radio and their excellent political art-rock LP Dear Science (the influential US website Pitchfork agreed with us); meanwhile, the readers chose Wisconsin’s cabin-dwelling troubadour Bon Iver and his album For Emma, Forever Ago. That year also saw brilliant albums by Vampire Weekend and MGMT – both, you guessed it, based in Brooklyn.
But the last 12 months have been triumphant for British music, and the Mercury panel has gone some way towards reflecting this. Nominations for Mumford & Sons and their tour-mate Laura Marling (also Marcus Mumford’s girlfriend) shine a light on the success of London’s so-called New Folk scene: both acts straddle the generation divide, uniting teenage fans with those who remember the halcyon days of 1960s folk. The recent success of “heritage” acts (Led Zeppelin, Leonard Cohen, the Police) has also generated a fresh appetite for reunions and revivals. Many of these acts get away with plundering their back catalogue; Weller, however, who has been making music for more than 30 years, has surprised everyone by moving on and releasing what critics have rated the best album of his career, Wake Up the Nation.
The nomination for Dizzee Rascal’s fourth album, Tongue N’ Cheek, is already bothering some: the prize is meant to reward artistic ambition, and many would argue that the 24-year-old rapper is more interested in raising his game commercially on this showing. But the last year has seen British hip-hop artists do the one thing no one expected: sell records. Chipmunk, N-Dubz and Tinchy Stryder have all topped the charts; none of them would be there without the man who won his first Mercury prize seven years ago for Boy in Da Corner.
My own favourite album on the list comes from Wild Beasts, whose music is hard to quantify (though you could reductively describe them as indie-pop). The Kendal four-piece have many remarkable strings to their bow: two lead singers capable of singing both in falsetto and baritone, an intrinsic understanding of rhythm and groove, a gift for visceral and poetic lyrics. They are also just the kind of band who could benefit from the exposure a Mercury win would bring them: they’re near enough the mainstream to accumulate a growing fanbase and critical praise, but without that translating to significant sales – yet.
Already the xx and Dizzee Rascal are favourites to win. The xx’s album has managed to hang on to its artistic credibility while being ubiquitous in the mainstream media (something the Mercury prize seems to value). Their songs sound as at home on hip music blogs as they do soundtracking Grey’s Anatomy – bracing, captivating and aching with languid sexuality.
Would it be good for the xx if they won? The Mercury prize can be a gift or a curse. While few would balk at the £20,000 prize fund that goes with it, you only have to look at the fate of last year’s winner, Speech Debelle, to be reminded how transient success can be. No sooner was she thanking indie label Big Dada for allowing her to release a “hip-hop Tracy Chapman” album than she dumped the label, after it became apparent that it took more than the approval of a roomful of music industry insiders to persuade the British public to pay for an album of dull art-rap that sounded nothing like Tracy Chapman.
Still, it’s not all bad news. As the Mercury limelight begins to swing towards some other lucky (or unlucky) soul, it was confirmed this week that Big Dada had reunited with Debelle; her next album, rumoured to be called The Art of Speech, will be released by them in the not-too-distant future.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/jul/20/mercury-prize-nominations
Mercury prize 2010: A dozen of the best to satisfy the judges
July 19, 2010 Filed under Uncategorized
(The Guardian)
Kitty Empire picks the albums she thinks should make the shortlist

Gorillaz: ‘an ecological concept album that yoked Snoop Doog, Lou Reed and the Syrian National Orchestra into a coherent whole’.
How slowly a year passes. It seems like only, ooh, 12 months ago that rapper Speech Debelle was first spotted on the 2009 Mercury prize shortlist. She went on to clinch the prize last September. Before her win, all that customary teeth-sucking talk about the Mercury curse (where the winners’ careers subsequently jump off a cliff) had even begun to subside a little, thanks to the warm, fuzzy “Elbow effect”. Pop justice was seen to be done when the manfully soppy Mancunian journeymen triumphed in 2008. (Well, I would say that, wouldn’t I? It was the year I was on the panel.)
But what industry wags now refer to as “Speech Debacle” saw Debelle record the worst post-Mercury album sales any winner has ever seen. Debelle left her label, Big Dada, in a huff, accusing it of failing to market her album sufficiently.
Since its inception, the Mercury has always made wildly idiosyncratic choices that often ignore the popular mood. And rightly so: this is a process that recognises that musical value should be measured by more subtle means than sales. It is absolutely about art, not about units. Even so, Speech Debacle still trumped Roni Sizegate: Debelle has gone to ground. No one has noticed.
So the pressure is on this year, to get it right – or at least, given that “right” is always in the blog rant of the beholder – less arrantly wrong. There will, of course, be heated panel conversations about the commercial explosion in homegrown urban music. Will they recognise N-Dubz and Chipmunk? Does the bangin’ disco-pop success of Dizzee Rascal preclude this former Mercury winner from another stab at the prize? Can any of the panel make it through the whole Muse album? We shall see. Below, in no particular order, are our 2010 runners and riders, a mercurial dozen that eschews token jazz entries and makes no apology for it.
MIA: /\/\ /\ Y /\
Motherhood has clearly not mellowed Mathangi Arulpragasam, British-Sri-Lankan noise-art provocateuse. Her bold, saturated third album comes bundled with in-built controversy, conspiracy theories and cacophonous post-R&B rhythms. But peel away (if you must) all the surface noise and art-school posturing, and feel the love, sadness and compassion within.
Trembling Bells: Abandoned Love
Feted by the eminence grise of British folk-rock, Joe Boyd, Trembling Bells were the just successors to Fairport Convention in a year when any old indie band with acoustic guitars were called “folk”. Lusty, erudite and keen on cross-pollinating Dylanesque choogle with earlie musicke, their second album crept out on Damon Albarn’s pleasingly unpredictable Honest Jon’s imprint.
Corinne Bailey Rae: The Sea
A media focus on the death of her husband might have looked prurient, but the emotional heft of Rae’s second album was inexorably linked to her personal tragedy. Critical, too, was the artistic maturing of the Leeds singer: the bland expanses of her debut being replaced by a sophisticated but notably unforced soulfulness.
Fuck Buttons: Tarot Sport
Well, at least their name would bring a shot of controversy to the Mercury. Fuck Buttons are two Bristolian geeks who emerged from the subterranean noise-rock scene, hooked up with techno veteran Andy Weatherall and made an album of chest-beating epics. Lord Coe should consider deploying their incredibly heroic “Olympians” for the 2012 campaign and not just because of the title.
These New Puritans: Hidden
Any number of post-punkish types were dropped or imploded in the past year or so as the selling power of British indie withered on the vine. Southend’s These New Puritans might not have sold millions, but they used minimal commercial expectations to their advantage and flourished into genuinely adventurous – a post-rock band who cite Peter Grimes as inspiration, for heaven’s sake – outsiders on their second album.
Gorillaz: Plastic Beach
A fractionally disappointing Glasto headline set and some cartoon personae who have, perhaps, outlived the joke should not detract from the latest achievement by Britpop renaissance man Damon Albarn. To wit: an ecological concept album that yoked Snoop Dogg, Lou Reed, the Syrian National Orchestra for Arabic Music and some killer tunes into a compellingly coherent whole.
The xx: xx
If the Mercury prize were awarded to the most slyly ubiquitous record of the year, then the xx would walk it. The enigmatic Putney band’s “Intro” has been TV’s soundbed of choice for months now. Chances are, though, that this enormously insidious hybrid of urban rhythms and brittle indie textures will be the strong favourite anyhow – and rightly so. You can imagine the panel meeting once, concurring that The xx should walk it, and saving a small fortune in tea and biscuits.
Hot Chip: One Life Stand
After the moderately disappointing Made in the Dark, Hot Chip’s fourth album was possibly their best yet, a masterclass in combining cutting-edge dancefloor tropes with a very poignant and eccentric tradition of English songwriting. With the title track, they created a marvellous anomaly: a club anthem about enduring monogamy.
Voice of the Seven Thunders: Voice of the Seven Thunders
Britain has been rather laggardly in producing new psychedelic rock bands in comparison to the currently flourishing American underground. Rick Tomlinson (formerly known as Voice of the Seven Woods) is the exception: a furiously inspired guitarist who can slip from acid-punk to pastoral folk to Turkish freak-outs in the space of one song.
Wild Beasts: Two Dancers
Somewhat brainier than the average British indie band – their fauvist-inspired name being only the tip of their intellectual iceberg – Lakeland lads Wild Beasts nevertheless began translating chin-stroker esteem into actual popularity with this superb second album. Hayden Thorpe’s uncanny falsetto (think the Associates’ Billy Mackenzie) was an acquired taste but was an integral part of their allure, at once arty and ribald, quirky and anthemic.
Tinchy Stryder: Catch 22
In a problematic year for the British music business, the success of homegrown urban pop was a commercial, if not critical, success. One-time grime MC Tinchy Stryder was the best of a variable, ambitious lot (N-Dubz, Chipmunk, Taio Cruz et al), parlaying a hard-earned credibility for actual hits and following a path effectively trodden by his Bow compadre Dizzee Rascal.
Laura Marling: I Speak Because I Can
Mumford & Sons might have sold more records, but Laura Marling’s second album is that unlikely thing among modern British artists, a follow-up album that makes good on this young singer-songwriter’s early promise. Part of Marling’s charm was her winning understatement, but also the way it intertwined with a quiet determination: her next record is a set with the White Stripes’ Jack White.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/jul/18/mercury-prize-2010-predictions
Florence and the Machine is Mercury Prize favourite… but award could still surprise
September 9, 2009 Filed under Dionysus
Comments Off
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article6825085.ece
Veronica Schmdit
The bets are in and Florence and the Machine is firmly installed as the favourite, but tonight’s Mercury Prize could still surprise music pundits.
The prestigious award, to be announced at a London ceremony this evening, has frequently stunned the industry, with M People taking the gong from Blur in 1995, and the Klaxons beating Amy Winehouse in 2007.
Women of the moment Florence Welch, who records under the name Florence and the Machine, still faces strong competition from a clutch of fellow females for the prize, given for the best album of the year.
Her hit release Lungs is up against the eponymous debut album from critical and chart favourite La Roux, fronted by the quiff-haired Elly Jackson. Also in the running is Bat for Lashes, aka alternative singer-songwriter Natasha Khan, who won over critics with her second album, Two Suns.
South London rapper Speeche Debelle is shortlisted for Speeche Therapy, while Lisa Hannigan, best known for her collaborations with Damien Rice, is up for Sea Sew.
But tonight’s ceremony at the West End’s Grosvenor House Hotel, is not an entirely female affair. The feted St Albans group Friendly Fires, Leicester rock band Kasabian, Scottish stadium favourites Glasvegas and the lesser known bands The Horrors, Led Bib, Sweet Billy Pilgrim and The Invisible are all on the shortlist.
Despite bookmaker’s putting the odds on Florence and the Machine, most music critics are resolutely refusing to make predictions, aware that the judging panel, made up of industry experts, often only makes its final decision moments before the announcement.
Analysing this year’s shortlist, The Times’s chief rock and pop critic, Pete Paphides, concluded that bookmakers’ odds were pointless and there was no way of knowing who would take the prize.
“They don’t just give it to the most popular one! Come to think of it, they don’t even always give it to the best one!”
The victor can look forward to a sharp rise in royalties – last year’s winner, Elbow, watched their album sales quadruple.
Tonight’s ceremony will mark the first time, since the prize’s inception in 1992, that all 12 nominees have played live.
The Mercury Prize shortlist
Kasabian — West Ryder Pauper Lunatic Asylum
The Horrors — Primary Colours
Friendly Fires — Friendly Fires
Glasvegas — Glasvegas
La Roux — La Roux
Florence And The Machine — Lungs
Bat For Lashes — Two Suns
Lisa Hannigan — Sea Sew
The Invisible — The Invisible
Led Bib — Sensible Shoes
Sweet Billy Pilgrim —Twice Born Men
Speech Debelle — Speech Therapy
The rise of a new wave of female singers
July 27, 2009 Filed under Dionysus
Comments Off
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article6725104.ece
An unprecedented number of women are on the Mercury prize shortlist. What’s going on? asks our reporter
Dan Cairns

At the beginning of this year, a rash of articles appeared in the print and online music media hailing 2009 as the year of women. The shortlist for the Mercury prize, announced last Tuesday, appears to bear this out: the five female artists nominated — Florence Welch, Elly Jackson of La Roux, Bat for Lashes’ Natasha Khan, the Irish singer-songwriter Lisa Hannigan and the south London rapper Speech Debelle — represent the biggest female presence in the prize’s 17-year history. Tweaked and recontextualised, the same slightly fevered articles have duly reappeared, with the five nominees (out of 12) cited as irrefutable evidence that the music business has been turned upside down, that the rulebook is being rewritten, that this is only the beginning.
It isn’t. It’s the end, or getting on for it. Artistically, the five women — three signed to major labels, two from the independent sector — may have been afforded space to develop and flourish creatively, and benefited from a degree of receptiveness to their music among record labels, radio stations and the music-buying public that would arguably not have been available in, say, 2005. Yet the cyclical nature of market forces, and the record industry’s response to them, suggest that 2009 will, in fact, be a high-water mark for women in pop. The arc that began with the worldwide success of Amy Winehouse and continued with similar breakthroughs by Duffy and Adele is dipping, rather than continuing to climb.
Market forces dictate music-making and our consumption of it as much as they do which brands of cereal and soft drinks are manufactured, promoted and purchased. Pop purists cry foul about this iron law, but without it, much pop would never be made. In the music industry, the market moves rather like a shoal of fish — setting a course, veering suddenly this way and that, those at the front dictating the direction, those at the back obeying the command. The market for this year’s female Mercury nominees was created directly by the multimillion sales of Winehouse’s Back to Black album. The major labels’ first response to that record’s success was to seek out similar artists: the second wave, if you like. Riding the crest of this were Adele and Duffy, both of whom made albums infused with the same retro-soul stylings. When Adele and Duffy broke through, labels saw the way the commercial winds were blowing and flung cheques in the direction of other up-and-coming female artists: the third post-Winehouse wave. In some cases — VV Brown, Pixie Lott — these were singers cut from Back to Black’s cloth. In others, newcomers such as Kate Nash benefited from a smaller, though far from insignificant, wave created by Lily Allen’s success. The fourth wave — with Florence and the Machine, La Roux and Little Boots at its forefront — is now approaching the shore.
If there is a fifth wave, it is unlikely to be more than a brief ripple.
Our focus will have switched. Different artists, probably male and almost certainly making music that isn’t either soul or electro-pop, will fill the music press, airwaves and charts. The biddability of all concerned — A&R executives, radio playlisters and the public — and the narrative we adhere to are the key factors here. During the nearly three-year period since Back to Black was released, that narrative has gradually come to be dominated by the notion that women are the driving commercial force in pop. As a result, everyone with a stake in the sourcing, marketing, making, publicising and purchasing of music has been more suggestible to the appeal of records released by female artists than at any other time in recent history. So, Winehouse begat Adele and Duffy, Allen opened the door for Nash, and the narrative in January this year was all about that dominance. Fans of particular artists would, of course, prefer to see their idols’ success as being based entirely on their distinctive merits. But that is simply not how the market operates.
The receptiveness is now embracing the five women on the Mercury shortlist, all of whom are making music of an experimentalism and fearlessness long, but quite inaccurately, associated with male musicians. They didn’t make that music because of the post-Winehouse narrative; but we are getting to hear their songs on a much wider scale as a result of it. These artists, the three signed to major labels in particular, are the beneficiaries of a process that began with Back to Black. We can wring our hands about the arbitrary and flibbertigibbety nature of that process, and bemoan the market’s short attention span and the briefness of its flirtations. Or we can look on the brighter side and conclude that a process that, no matter the impulses that drive it, results in the signing, release of music by and public enthusiasm for female artists as talented as Amy Winehouse, Adele, La Roux, Speech Debelle and Natasha Khan is getting something very right indeed.
That process is now, inexorably, reaching its end. The narrative will soon be rewritten. Record-company cheques are now being signed that are made out to male musicians. Earlier this year, the female spoken-word electro singer George Pringle spoke about her experiences with major labels. “Some of them have said things,” she remarked, “such as, ‘We’ve signed a lot of girls recently, so we can’t sign you.’” So, 2009 may indeed be the year of women in pop, and hallelujah for that. But we had better enjoy it while we can.
Mercury prize 2009 nominations announced
July 22, 2009 Filed under Uncategorized
Comments Off
(The Guardian)
By Rosie Swash
Florence and the Machine, Kasabian and Bat for Lashes are favourites to win the £20,000 prize, while La Roux and Glasvegas are also hotly tipped.

Mercury prize 2009 nominees … Bat for Lashes, La Roux, Florence and the Machine.
The Mercury prize nominations for 2009’s best album have been announced, and the list features the eclectic lineup of newcomers, chart stars and unknowns the prestigious award has become known for.
Florence and the Machine, Kasabian and Bat for Lashes are the favourites to walk away with the £20,000 prize, voted for by a panel of critics and music industry figures. Synth-pop duo La Roux and Scottish indie-rock quartet Glasvegas are also hotly tipped.
Among the lesser-known artists are south London rapper Speech Debelle and art-rock trio the Invisible, while eccentric quintet Led Bib and folk group Sweet Billy Pilgrim make up the more leftfield nominations.
Typically for the Mercury prize, the omissions are as surprising as the artists that made the final cut. Both Lily Allen (who was also overlooked for her 2006 debut album Alright, Still) and Manchester group Doves were rumoured to be odds on to win, but neither have been nominated.
The Mercury prize was established in 1992 as an alternative to the more commercially minded Brit awards. A panel of industry experts, including journalists, musicians and independent-label executives, debate the merits of what they believe to be the finest British albums from the past year, regardless of sales or radio play. Previous winners include Portishead, PJ Harvey and Arctic Monkeys.
But the Mercury prize’s reputation as an awards ceremony that celebrates quality over sales has come in for a bashing in recent years as the prize itself grows in stature. “I think there’s a tendency for a knee-jerk negative reaction to the Mercury nominations – to see what’s not on the list, what they’ve missed out,” said the Guardian’s chief pop critic Alexis Petridis. “The whole concept behind the shortlist is really nebulous. Is it artistic endeavour? Or is it a degree of commercial success, because there’s certainly never any outright commercial flops on the list?” Petridis continues: “There’s not a vast amount in the way of dance or urban music, nor are there artists with any kind of lengthy history. I’m not sure what happened to Manic Street Preachers’ nomination, but there you go.”
As for Lily Allen and that phantom nomination, the singer has already taken to her Twitter page to say, “I hope La Roux wins”.
The winner of this year’s award will be announced on 8 September 2009.
Nominations for the Mercury prize 2009 (with odds from bookmaker William Hill)
Florence and the Machine – Lungs 5/1
Kasabian – West Ryder Pauper Lunatic Asylum 5/1
Bat for Lashes – Two Suns 6/1
La Roux – La Roux 6/1
Glasvegas – Glasvegas 6/1
Speech Debelle – Speech Therapy 8/1
Friendly Fires – Friendly Fires 8/11
The Horrors – Primary Colours 8/1
Lisa Hannigan – Sea Sew 8/1
The Invisible – The Invisible 10/1
Led Bib – Sensible Shoes 10/1
Sweet Billy Pilgrim – Twice Born Men 10/1
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/jul/21/mercury-prize-2009-nominations-announced
Female solo artists dominate Mercury prize nominations
July 22, 2009 Filed under Dionysus
Comments Off
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article6721764.ece
Female solo artists dominate this year’s Mercury Prize nominations, with women making up five of the 12 acts nominated for the prestigious music prize.
Those up for the prize, which is for the best British album released in the past year, include La Roux, fronted by Elly Jackson, Bat For Lashes — otherwise known as Natasha Khan — and Florence and the Machine, who have already won a Brit award.
Even more women could have made the list, but despite being hotly tipped to land a nomination, neither Lily Allen nor Little Boots were recognised by the panel.
Kasabian were nominated for the first time for their third album, West Ryder Pauper Lunatic Asylum, alongside fellow rockers Glasvegas and The Horrors.
Simon Frith, chair of the judges, said: “It’s been a strong year for women because you’ve got them working across a broad range of genres, rather than just pop, which they’ve dominated in previous years.”
The other two women on the list are the urban act Speech Debelle and Lisa Hannigan, the Irish folk musician.
Seven of the 12 albums are debut releases, including a self-titled album by The Invisible. The token jazz act in the nominations is Led Bib, for Sensible Shoes.
The bookmakers William Hill installed Kasabian and Florence and the Machine as joint 5/1 favourites.
The shortlist
*Kasabian — West Ryder Pauper Lunatic Asylum
*The Horrors — Primary Colours
*Friendly Fires — Friendly Fires
*Glasvegas — Glasvegas
*La Roux — La Roux
*Florence And The Machine — Lungs
*Bat For Lashes — Two Suns
*Lisa Hannigan — Sea Sew
*The Invisible — the Invisible
*Led Bib — Sensible Shoes
*Sweet Billy Pilgrim —Twice Born Men
*Speech Debelle — Speech Therapy





