Back to BeijingToday Coverpage

DOC.BE. Live Soundtrack Concert

September 10, 2010  Filed under Yu Shanshan  

the goddess

Event information

Event name:DOC.BE. Live Soundtrack Concert

Host:Yugong Yishan

Event type:Music – Concert

Location:3-2 Zhangzizhong Lu, Dongcheng

Time & Place

Date:September 12, 2010

Time:20:00 – 23:00

Neighbourhood:东城区(Dongcheng) District

Phone:64042711

E-mail:info@yugongyishan.com

Event Description

The story has begun since three years ago. The Two Big Men, Xiao He and Song Yuzhe were invited to Brussels. They performed a live soundtrack on the brilliant old Chinese silent film « Goddess » with three Belgian-based musicians Eric, Quentin and Yannick together. The concert was a tremendous success in what was an unforgettable evening ! Today in the context of the Doc.Be.Project, an event focused on Belgian documentaries in China, we have the opportunity to put the Live Soundtrack experience back on track again. The belgian musicians would be brought in Beijing, joined by Matthieu Ha with accordian, another talented musician. On Sept.12, they will encounter on the stage of Yugongyishan and re-perform the live soundtrack on « The Goddess » for the pleasure of Chinese ears to discover it!

Pm 8.30 // Rmb 60 (door) / Rmb 50 (presale) / Rmb 30 (students)

Every Sun Jam Session

September 10, 2010  Filed under Yu Shanshan  

jam session

Event information

Event name:EVERY SUN. JAM SESSION

Host:Ferrytian

Event type: Music – Concert

Location:Unit 1-30 on 3rd floor of tower S1.No.19 Sanlitun Road, Chaoyang District,Beijing

Time & Place

Date:September 12, 2010

Time:21:00 – 0:00

Neighbourhood:朝阳区(Chaoyang) DistrictPhone:18701329192

Event Description

Club Le offers every Beijing musician the most wonderful communicate platform
No matter who and what level you are
You will find out the best understanding of symphony
Every musician who performs will get a free drink

Read more: http://events.myspace.com/Event/View/7256952#ixzz0yvCRryf7

Paul Oakenfold, Armin van Buuren and Paul van Dyk unite for Love Parade tribute

September 8, 2010  Filed under howie wang  

(The Guardian)

Superstar DJs dedicate track to victims of German festival tragedy, with proceeds going to those injured and the families of those who died

Victims-of-Love-Parade-tr-006

Love Parade victims remembered … charity single to benefit those affected.

Some of the world’s top DJs have announced a new collaboration dedicated to the victims of this year’s Love Parade tragedy. Paul Oakenfold, Armin van Buuren and Paul van Dyk have recorded a new song, Remember Love, with proceeds going to those affected by the stampede in Duisburg, Germany.
“I think this is the first time this has ever been done in the dance scene, to give back, to help people,” Oakenfold said. “In many other music genres, artists come together, like Live Aid and after the Haiti disaster. We should do something [too].” The project began with Oakenfold, who wrote the song’s basic structure and then spent the past month co-producing with Van Buuren and Van Dyk. “I thought it was a good idea to have England, Holland and Germany coming together,” he said. “Love Parade [represented] a big part of the essence of the dance movement.”
Twenty-one people died and dozens were injured after panic broke out at this year’s Love Parade festival inGermany. Hundreds of people stampeded toward an entrance tunnel when police began turning festivalgoers away. Organisers have announced that the annual event, which began as a Berlin peace march in 1989, will not take place again.
“In its last years outside Berlin, the vibe of the Love Parade was a far cry from its original spirit,” said Van Dyk, who has performed several times at the festival. “With Remember Love, we want to recapture the essence of Love Parade and try to assist those who suffered.”
The single will go on sale on 11 September, initially available exclusively on Beatport. According to Oakenfold, Remember Love offers his signature “melodicism”, Van Buuren’s “emotion and movement” and “the energy and uplifting touch that no one does better than Paul van Dyk”. Proceeds will go to the Association of Non-statutory Welfare in North Rhine-Westphalia Germany, which launched a campaign to benefit the families and victims affected by the July 24 tragedy.

Some of the world’s top DJs have announced a new collaboration dedicated to the victims of this year’s Love Parade tragedy. Paul Oakenfold, Armin van Buuren and Paul van Dyk have recorded a new song, Remember Love, with proceeds going to those affected by the stampede in Duisburg, Germany.


“I think this is the first time this has ever been done in the dance scene, to give back, to help people,” Oakenfold said. “In many other music genres, artists come together, like Live Aid and after the Haiti disaster. We should do something [too].” The project began with Oakenfold, who wrote the song’s basic structure and then spent the past month co-producing with Van Buuren and Van Dyk. “I thought it was a good idea to have England, Holland and Germany coming together,” he said. “Love Parade [represented] a big part of the essence of the dance movement.”


Twenty-one people died and dozens were injured after panic broke out at this year’s Love Parade festival inGermany. Hundreds of people stampeded toward an entrance tunnel when police began turning festivalgoers away. Organisers have announced that the annual event, which began as a Berlin peace march in 1989, will not take place again.


“In its last years outside Berlin, the vibe of the Love Parade was a far cry from its original spirit,” said Van Dyk, who has performed several times at the festival. “With Remember Love, we want to recapture the essence of Love Parade and try to assist those who suffered.”


The single will go on sale on 11 September, initially available exclusively on Beatport. According to Oakenfold, Remember Love offers his signature “melodicism”, Van Buuren’s “emotion and movement” and “the energy and uplifting touch that no one does better than Paul van Dyk”. Proceeds will go to the Association of Non-statutory Welfare in North Rhine-Westphalia Germany, which launched a campaign to benefit the families and victims affected by the July 24 tragedy.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/sep/06/love-parade-tribute

The xx win Mercury prize 2010

September 8, 2010  Filed under howie wang  

(The Guardian)

Indie minimalists The xx take home coveted £20,000 Mercury prize for eponymous debut album

The-xx-receive-their-awar-006

The xx receive their award on stage at the Mercury prize awards.

Ethereal indie minimalists The xx last night won the Barclaycard Mercury Prize and the £20,000 cash that goes with it for their eponymous debut album, beating 11 other acts.
It was a popular decision loudly welcomed by the great and good of the music industry who cheered loudly – and with genuine appreciation – as the group members took to the stage in the Grosvenor House hotel, in central London.
There was little air punching or exclamations of joy. Once on stage singer and guitarist Ollie Sim managed a breathless “wow”. He thanked the judges and the band’s record label: “We have had the most incredible year and it’s felt like every day we have woken up to something incredible that we were expecting.
“It’s felt a bit like a haze to us, being here has been a weird moment of clarity. It just means so much.”
Asked what the band would spend the prize money on Romy Madley Croft suggested it might go towards building their own studio, since their first album had been made in a converted basement the size of a bathroom. “We’re all very excited to make new music,” she said.
Martin Mills, founder and chairman of Beggars group, which houses the band said: ‘The xx is a perfect winner for the Mercurys – a completely fresh sound, which over time becomes an intimate friend.”
The reason the panel of judges chose this album could be distilled into one word, said chief of judges Simon Frith: “Atmosphere.”
He said the decision had not been easy but the panel had been wowed by the album. “It has the most amazing sense of mood and atmosphere and there is really nothing quite like it.” Thanks to a number of adverts and endorsements the album had imprinted itself on the public’s consciousness, he added. “It appears to have become like part of the soundscape in an almost invisible fashion. It also captures a sense of the uneasy times we live in. It’s a very urban record.”
The xx had been hotly tipped to win the award since being nominated back in July. Their album, released in August last year, was praised for its “lightness of touch at play that gives The xx a sophistication beyond their years” in the Observer.
The three-piece band from London who formed in 2005, met at Elliott School, notable for alumni including Hot Chip, Burial, The Maccabees and Four Tet.
Recorded, mainly at night, in the basement of the XL studios the melancholic, almost dream-like, album wowed critics when it was released, featuring highly in NME and Rolling Stone’s “best of the year” lists.
Released in August last year, The xx entered the chart at 36, slipping to 62 a week later. Showing that the Mercurys still have some power despite the naysayers which question its relevance, after the album’s nomination it jumped from 44 to 16 in the charts, quickly becoming the favourite to win the prize.
Rock veteran Paul Weller, despite being the late favourite to win after a sudden surge of bets on his album Wake Up the Nation, missed out along with nominees Wild Beasts, Laura Marling, I Am Kloot, Villagers, Foals, Dizzee Rascal, Mumford & Sons, Biffy Clyro and Corinne Bailey Rae and Kit Downes Trio.
Paul Stokes, associate editor of NME, said that based on pre-awards hype, there might have been a suggestion that the judges would opt for the obvious choice. “But let’s not forget this is an album made by self-confessed social outcasts, that merges the fringes of indie and dance culture. That it has become the favourite demonstrates this album’s true achievement.”

Ethereal indie minimalists The xx last night won the Barclaycard Mercury Prize and the £20,000 cash that goes with it for their eponymous debut album, beating 11 other acts.


It was a popular decision loudly welcomed by the great and good of the music industry who cheered loudly – and with genuine appreciation – as the group members took to the stage in the Grosvenor House hotel, in central London.


There was little air punching or exclamations of joy. Once on stage singer and guitarist Ollie Sim managed a breathless “wow”. He thanked the judges and the band’s record label: “We have had the most incredible year and it’s felt like every day we have woken up to something incredible that we were expecting.


“It’s felt a bit like a haze to us, being here has been a weird moment of clarity. It just means so much.”


Asked what the band would spend the prize money on Romy Madley Croft suggested it might go towards building their own studio, since their first album had been made in a converted basement the size of a bathroom. “We’re all very excited to make new music,” she said.


Martin Mills, founder and chairman of Beggars group, which houses the band said: ‘The xx is a perfect winner for the Mercurys – a completely fresh sound, which over time becomes an intimate friend.”


The reason the panel of judges chose this album could be distilled into one word, said chief of judges Simon Frith: “Atmosphere.”


He said the decision had not been easy but the panel had been wowed by the album. “It has the most amazing sense of mood and atmosphere and there is really nothing quite like it.” Thanks to a number of adverts and endorsements the album had imprinted itself on the public’s consciousness, he added. “It appears to have become like part of the soundscape in an almost invisible fashion. It also captures a sense of the uneasy times we live in. It’s a very urban record.”


The xx had been hotly tipped to win the award since being nominated back in July. Their album, released in August last year, was praised for its “lightness of touch at play that gives The xx a sophistication beyond their years” in the Observer.


The three-piece band from London who formed in 2005, met at Elliott School, notable for alumni including Hot Chip, Burial, The Maccabees and Four Tet.


Recorded, mainly at night, in the basement of the XL studios the melancholic, almost dream-like, album wowed critics when it was released, featuring highly in NME and Rolling Stone’s “best of the year” lists.


Released in August last year, The xx entered the chart at 36, slipping to 62 a week later. Showing that the Mercurys still have some power despite the naysayers which question its relevance, after the album’s nomination it jumped from 44 to 16 in the charts, quickly becoming the favourite to win the prize.


Rock veteran Paul Weller, despite being the late favourite to win after a sudden surge of bets on his album Wake Up the Nation, missed out along with nominees Wild Beasts, Laura Marling, I Am Kloot, Villagers, Foals, Dizzee Rascal, Mumford & Sons, Biffy Clyro and Corinne Bailey Rae and Kit Downes Trio.


Paul Stokes, associate editor of NME, said that based on pre-awards hype, there might have been a suggestion that the judges would opt for the obvious choice. “But let’s not forget this is an album made by self-confessed social outcasts, that merges the fringes of indie and dance culture. That it has become the favourite demonstrates this album’s true achievement.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/sep/08/the-xx-mercury-prize-2010

Mercury prize: Paul Weller at centre of ‘biggest turnaround in music betting for 40 years’

September 7, 2010  Filed under howie wang  

(The Guardian)

Fifty-two-year-old musician’s odds slashed from 20/1 to 1/10 after ‘huge surge’ of bets placed in his favour

paul-weller-001

Mercury prize favourite … Paul Weller.

Paul Weller is now the favourite to win the Mercury prize after bookmakers William Hill said the singer was at the centre of the “biggest turnaround in music betting for the last 40 years”. The 52-year-old musician’s odds for winning the prize have been slashed from 20/1 to a 1/10 after William Hill reported a “huge surge” in bets placed on the singer over the weekend.
William Hill spokesman Rupert Adams said Weller received hundreds of bets in “the space of about an hour and a half”, saying that activity at their Birmingham branches was particularly fervent. As a result, Weller has overtaken the XX as William Hill’s favourite to win the music industry prize.
“In no way are we suggesting that this surge in bets reflects anything untoward in the Mercury camp. The change in odds is not a comment on the integrity of the judges,” said Adams. “Our feeling is a consensus has built that Weller is likely to be handed the award because it could well be his last chance to win it.”
Weller’s inclusion has been compared to the nomination of an older actor who had perhaps missed out on an Oscar years before. The singer’s album Wild Wood was listed for the Mercury prize in 1994, but lost out to M People’s Elegant Slumming. Weller, perhaps portentously, told the Guardian earlier this year: “Once you’re past 30 and haven’t died of consumption, they start awarding you these things for staying alive.”
This is not the first time Paul Weller has been at the centre of a last-minute surge in bets ahead of an industry award; in February 2009, William Hill suspended all betting for the singer to win the Brit award for best male solo artist after a rush of bets were placed in his favour in the run-up to the awards. But whereas the Brit winners are decided on days before the event, the Mercury winner is not finalised until the night of the awards itself. William Hill believes this is the result of customers trying to second guess how the judges will vote on the night.
The Mercury prize takes place tomorrow evening (Tuesday 7 September) and will be televised on BBC 2 from 10pm.

Paul Weller is now the favourite to win the Mercury prize after bookmakers William Hill said the singer was at the centre of the “biggest turnaround in music betting for the last 40 years”. The 52-year-old musician’s odds for winning the prize have been slashed from 20/1 to a 1/10 after William Hill reported a “huge surge” in bets placed on the singer over the weekend.


William Hill spokesman Rupert Adams said Weller received hundreds of bets in “the space of about an hour and a half”, saying that activity at their Birmingham branches was particularly fervent. As a result, Weller has overtaken the XX as William Hill’s favourite to win the music industry prize.


“In no way are we suggesting that this surge in bets reflects anything untoward in the Mercury camp. The change in odds is not a comment on the integrity of the judges,” said Adams. “Our feeling is a consensus has built that Weller is likely to be handed the award because it could well be his last chance to win it.”


Weller’s inclusion has been compared to the nomination of an older actor who had perhaps missed out on an Oscar years before. The singer’s album Wild Wood was listed for the Mercury prize in 1994, but lost out to M People’s Elegant Slumming. Weller, perhaps portentously, told the Guardian earlier this year: “Once you’re past 30 and haven’t died of consumption, they start awarding you these things for staying alive.”


This is not the first time Paul Weller has been at the centre of a last-minute surge in bets ahead of an industry award; in February 2009, William Hill suspended all betting for the singer to win the Brit award for best male solo artist after a rush of bets were placed in his favour in the run-up to the awards. But whereas the Brit winners are decided on days before the event, the Mercury winner is not finalised until the night of the awards itself. William Hill believes this is the result of customers trying to second guess how the judges will vote on the night.


The Mercury prize takes place tomorrow evening (Tuesday 7 September) and will be televised on BBC 2 from 10pm.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/sep/06/mercury-prize-paul-weller

Eminem label loses court battle over digital royalties

September 7, 2010  Filed under howie wang  

(The Guardian)

Universal Music ordered to pay rapper’s former production company 50% of revenue from downloads

Eminem-live-in-Detroit-006

Shady deal … Eminem’s label ordered to pay digital royalties to production company.

An appeals court has ruled against Eminem’s label, ordering Universal Music to pay royalties to the rapper’s former production company. In a precedent that could be worth billions of pounds to the recording industry, the US 9th circuit court of appeals declared FBT Productions was entitled to 50% of Universal’s revenue from digital sales.
FBT Productions signed Eminem to an exclusive record deal in 1995, before he was famous; when Eminem went to Universal, FBT was entitled to a 12% royalty on “records sold”. But in the pre-iTunes era, the digital royalty rate wasn’t made clear. FBT argued digital sales are not “records sold” but constitute a licensing of master recordings – entitling them to 50% of net receipts. A court rejected this argument in March 2009, but this decision has now been overruled. According to the appeals court, the contracts were “unambiguous”. The case has now been sent back to the lower court for further proceedings.
FBT’s case against Universal is worth several million pounds in royalties and damages, but the impact could be even larger. Twenty years ago, lawyers could not have imagined innovations such as the iTunes Music Store, and in certain contracts, it’s unclear which royalty rates apply. While Universal Music insists the FBT case “sets no legal precedent” and concerns “the language of one specific recording agreement”, these sorts of ambiguities could be present in thousands of legacy contracts. If the courts interpret this language in certain ways, the costs could add up quickly.
Universal Music has already announced it will file for a new hearing.

An appeals court has ruled against Eminem’s label, ordering Universal Music to pay royalties to the rapper’s former production company. In a precedent that could be worth billions of pounds to the recording industry, the US 9th circuit court of appeals declared FBT Productions was entitled to 50% of Universal’s revenue from digital sales.


FBT Productions signed Eminem to an exclusive record deal in 1995, before he was famous; when Eminem went to Universal, FBT was entitled to a 12% royalty on “records sold”. But in the pre-iTunes era, the digital royalty rate wasn’t made clear. FBT argued digital sales are not “records sold” but constitute a licensing of master recordings – entitling them to 50% of net receipts. A court rejected this argument in March 2009, but this decision has now been overruled. According to the appeals court, the contracts were “unambiguous”. The case has now been sent back to the lower court for further proceedings.


FBT’s case against Universal is worth several million pounds in royalties and damages, but the impact could be even larger. Twenty years ago, lawyers could not have imagined innovations such as the iTunes Music Store, and in certain contracts, it’s unclear which royalty rates apply. While Universal Music insists the FBT case “sets no legal precedent” and concerns “the language of one specific recording agreement”, these sorts of ambiguities could be present in thousands of legacy contracts. If the courts interpret this language in certain ways, the costs could add up quickly.


Universal Music has already announced it will file for a new hearing.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/sep/06/eminem-label-loses-court-battle

N-Dubz: ‘We were naughty. We used to cause madness!’

September 6, 2010  Filed under howie wang  

(The Guardian)

The three members of N-Dubz have overcome tough upbringings and personal tragedy to become the country’s most entertaining pop act

N-Dubz-006 (1)

Dappy projects his small, wiry Anglo-Greek Cypriot self into an east London photographic studio at a little under a billion miles an hour. “Hello!” he shouts, his face only inches away from mine. “Hello, darling!”
Dino Contostavlos is 23 years old, very loud and, yes, really very small. He’s instant. An intense, irrepressible, busy and bossy, inescapably charming springer spaniel of a human. “Hello Dappy,” I say. He shakes my hand vigorously and kisses me on the cheek, then bounces off to inspect the far reaches of the studio. The air in the room, which had until that point been calm, composed and perhaps somewhat stagnant, is violently resuscitated by his presence.
“Where is everybody?” he shouts. I shrug; I was hoping he could tell me.
Dappy is an hour-and-a-half late for our interview, but his bandmates – his cousin Tulisa (Tula Contostavlos, 22), and his best friend Fazer (Richard Rawson, 23) – are later still.
Dappy tsks his annoyance. “Where the fuck are they?” He turns to me. He looks distraught. “I’m so sorry, darling! This is so embarrassing!” He runs to the studio door and shouts: “Fazer? Fazer! Let’s go, let’s go, let’s go! T! Ready? Ready, T? Ready? Come on! People are waiting!” A minute passes and then Fazer and Tulisa materialise. They enter the room in a less explosive manner: Fazer (all Gucci and appraising sideways glances) is mid-text. Tulisa (dollish, glossy, watchful) walks gingerly in vertiginous heels.
So there they are: N-Dubz. The hip-hop/R&B/multi-platform pop culture sensation. They’ve got a devoted fan base, two triple-platinum albums, seven top 20 singles, three sell-out tours, one bestselling book and Being N-Dubz, a massively successful Channel 4 documentary series, under their belt.
In other news: they’ve experienced not inconsiderable bother with the law, developed a tricky relationship with the tabloid press and clocked up what is, to date, the only celebrity association with the recently banned drug miaow miaow (in April, Dappy was caught on film ingesting methadrone – miaow miaow – in a nightclub, much to the delight of the Sun). That’s without touching on a kiss-and-tell story (again, all Dappy’s work) and the somewhat difficult coda to an interview on Radio 1’s Chris Moyles Show: Dappy took the mobile phone number of an unappreciative texter and began sending her death threats.
Despite which – or, possibly, because of which – when N-Dubz range around me and grin, I am overwhelmed with good feeling towards them.
In a pop scene dominated by the saccharine, the sterile, the X-Factored and the media trained, N-Dubz are a raging, sporadically illegal, unrefined, imperfect and beautiful anomaly. They are authentic, outspoken and raw – and no one saw them coming.
They were formed 11 years ago by Dappy’s father, Byron Contostavlos: “Uncle B! Yeah! It was Uncle B who put us together.” Contostavlos was a musician (formerly of Mungo Jerry) turned Camden Town barber. He wanted to protect his son, niece and Fazer and inspire them, keep them on the straight and narrow from which they were showing signs of veering, with enthusiasm.
As kids, Dappy, Tulisa and Fazer had an impoverished and harsh upbringing in north London. All three attended Haverstock Hill comprehensive in Chalk Farm, a school that had churned out David and Ed Miliband 15 years earlier. But it is fair to say that N-Dubz’s experience of growing up was not especially Milibandesque. Gangs, drugs, criminality and bad behaviour defined their youth. They were shaped by the toughness of their environment, they embraced and revelled in it. They do still, to a degree: the name N-Dubz is a contraction of the Camden postcode, NW1; the bad behaviour remains part of their shtick.
“We were naughty!” says Dappy, with relish. “Me and Fazer, we used to go out on the streets and cause madness.”
“Me and Dappy were on the wrong path,” confirms Fazer. He pauses, solemnly. He isn’t afraid of grand utterances. “Music is the saviour for us.”
“We could have went: bam! Prison, stabbed, jail, shot, finished!” adds Dappy. He claps his hands together to emphasise each word.
It took N-Dubz eight years to break through. Uncle B scraped together money with which to hire studio space and pay for three white-label albums. He entered the band into talent competitions: “We won a lot of them!” says Dappy.
“We won all of them!” says Fazer.
“Well, there were only, like, one or two,” says Tulisa. She sits quietly; she lets the men talk and chips in only if you ask her something directly or she needs to correct Dappy.
“Three! Three or four!” Fazer protests.
“It was one,” Tulisa tells me. She sighs. “Or two.”
“And they promised us the world! Superstardom!” says Dappy. “But… nothing.”
Still, they persevered. They wrote, they gigged, they recorded, they had meetings with record company execs. No one signed them; progress was slow. You were young, I say. That demonstrated a great deal of dedication and discipline.
“All that dedication and discipline was Uncle B,” says Dappy. “All of it.”
N-Dubz gained a significant fan base while still unsigned and underground; their self-released videos received airplay on urban digital channel Channel U. But in 2007 they began to receive mainstream attention. In November of that year, following exposure on YouTube and spiralling viral support, they were awarded a Mobo for best newcomer. This brought them to the attention of Polydor, which rereleased their single “You Better Not Waste My Time”, taking it to No 26 in the charts. Things were looking up.
And then, suddenly, Uncle B died.
I can’t imagine how painful that must have been, I say. For all of you, but for Dappy specifically. To lose your mentor, your manager. Your father.
“Yes, but that was when it blew!” says Dappy. His tone doesn’t vary; he’s still excitable, bouncy, silly, inclined to segue off on wild conversational tangents. “The night after he died, we was on stage, in front of 2,000 people. Crying. Crying on stage!”
Had he been ill for a while?
“He knew he had a problem inside him. He could feel it. He had bronchitis in his lungs. Infect, infect, blocked artery…” Dappy makes a comedy choking noise, squeezes his own throat. “Gone!”
So it was a sudden death as far as you were concerned?
“He died, with the remote control in his hand, watching Channel U.”
“Waiting for our video,” says Fazer.
“Waiting for our video. I gave him mouth to mouth.” Dappy demonstrates.
So, wait. Dappy, you found your father’s body?
“Yes! Mouth to mouth, knocked on his head! His head was blue! Cold!”
He stops. I look at the “RIP Dad” tattoo on Dappy’s neck. A week later, when I join the band on a video shoot in the south of France, I overhear him telling the video director that he needs to be shot from a certain angle because “it shows the Dad tattoo better”. I know that the band’s breakthrough album, 2008’s Uncle B, and their sixth single, “Papa Can You Hear Me?”, were both dedicated to Byron Contostavlos. Dappy’s grief is opaque and coded and discordantly intertwined with the earliest stages of N-Dubz’s success.
It has been a little over three years since Uncle B died, and a little over two and a half since the band began securing hits and growing their fan base exponentially via Being N-Dubz, the Channel 4 documentary devoted to them. They were dropped by Polydor but soon re-signed to All Around the World, a subsidiary of the same parent company, Universal. No one can tell me exactly how much N-Dubz are currently worth, although Rich Castillo, one of their managers, guesses it’s around the £2m mark. “They keep 80% of the money, because they write and produce everything themselves.” (”And then they go and spend it all on jewellery,” a member of their entourage whispers later.)
Their music has tipped them into ubiquity through the course of 2010. If you think you don’t know N-Dubz’s songs, you’re completely wrong. You do. It’s that gimmicky, hyper-commercial blend of R&B and hip-hop with a grimy edge – the one with the contrasting hard and raw lyrical motifs that cover crack deals, Facebook stalking and unwanted pregnancies. It’s as buoyant, irrepressible and infectious as Dappy – and it is playing out on any radio station remotely interested in snaring a teenage demographic. You’ll know it by Dappy’s recurring “Na na, na-ay” and by Tulisa’s cod-operatic warblings.
So, I say, you lot are famous!
“Yes!” says Dappy. And: “Wow!”
“Wow!” says Fazer. “Our dreams come true!”
“Thing is,” says Tulisa, the voice of pragmatism, “we haven’t had time to register it. We’ve just come back from America, from LA, and stuff, where we’re not really known yet, so…”
Yet? You expect that to change?
“Oh, soon we’ll be the biggest…” says Dappy.
“Huge,” offers Fazer.
“Oh, yeah. We’ll be big over there.”
“Four hundred per cent,” says Fazer. “Four hundred per cent.”
Which might even turn out to be the case. N-Dubz are signed to Def Jam in the US, a label that counts Kanye West, Justin Bieber and Rihanna among its artists. In November, the band will release their first single on Def Jam. They’re vague on their precise strategy for breaking the US, but as far as I can work out, it revolves around elocution lessons and not using “innit” as a lyric any more. “Or ‘You get me’!” says Fazer. “Or ‘dahn’ when we mean ‘down’. Other people around the world, if we say, ‘Get dahn!’, well, they’re going to say, ‘What’s he talking about?’”
“And also because we’ve got a vision, a global vision, and we know where we’re going in our global vision,” says Dappy. “And because me and Tulisa have stopped the arguing and the crap…”
Oh, but hang on: you’ve stopped the arguing? I say. Dappy and Tulisa’s fights are epic, the main narrative strand in the Being N-Dubz documentaries.
“We made a pact,” says Tulisa. “Ten years of arguing is enough. We’ve stopped. It’s been a month, now.”
And that’s it? (I’m disappointed; I’d hoped to witness one in the flesh.)
“I did a Dappy tattoo, as a pact of goodwill,” she says. She leans forward and sweeps her super-long hair extensions off her shoulders. The base of her neck reads “Dappy”.
“D. A. P. P. Y.,” says Fazer, helpfully.
“Now every time she sees I’m being naughty, she goes like…” Dappy tips his head forward. “And I’m like: ooooh!” He emits a high-pitched, fearful scream. Tulisa smiles a satisfied smile.
I am intrigued by Tula Constostavlos. Dappy is preposterously charismatic, and Fazer is a competent sidekick, but Tulisa is a truly interesting proposition, rare by anyone’s standards. She looks like the definitive R&B glamour piece: all sparkle, cleavage-encasing cocktail dresses and heavy makeup on a pretty face. I’d initially assumed she was window dressing, but later I’d begun to understand the extent of the power she wields over her bandmates and how central and defining a part of the proceedings she was.
And then I watched Tulisa: My Mum and Me, a BBC3 documentary which revealed that, aged 11, Tulisa had become the primary carer for her mother, Anne, who suffers from an extreme mood disorder, an intense combination of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
In the film, Tulisa talked dispassionately about watching her mother being sectioned for the first time when Tulisa was five; about how the stress of the situation had pushed her to self-harm, to eating disorders, to depression. She explained that she had attempted suicide twice before she was 18: she’d tried to overdose on pills at 14 and slashed her wrists three years later. Tulisa began writing songs as therapy at 11; Uncle B and N-Dubz became a refuge for her. When I ask her where she’d be without N-Dubz, she says, steadily: “It would be suicide. I don’t want to go on and bring it all back to the depression, but… I would not be here. Let’s say that.”
We cover vast swaths of ground during our 40-minute chat. Dappy’s undisciplined ramblings power us into bizarre territory. We address N-Dubz’s experience of celebrity. There are the girls: “I’m not going to lie,” says Dappy. “When we first got famous, using our music to get girls and shit. Long time ago. Not any more.” No? “No! I’ve got a wife!” Or rather a long-term, if on-and-off, girlfriend, Kaye Vassell, with whom he has an 18-month-old son. “Yeah. I got one kid, one on the way. Fazer’s got five. Ha ha! No! No, he hasn’t. He hasn’t got any.”
And there are the other perks of fame: the discounts. “Twenty-five per cent off a car, just because you’re famous!” says Tulisa. “The more money you make, the less you have to pay for things.” Which is peculiar? “It is. It is.”
“People who can afford stuff and it’s free! And those that can’t, it’s a higher price! It should be the other way round,” says Fazer.
You’re socialists?
“Ha! Yeah,” says Tulisa. “Although I ain’t feeling the 50% tax bracket.”
We address the fans, who are staggeringly devoted. “I saw one, with a tattoo… of my face! My face! On someone’s arm,” says Dappy. How was that? “Oh, great! It’s absolutely great!”
“I’ve had the whole of Fulham youth club outside my house for a week,” reveals Fazer, obscurely.
And we address the haters, the people who post videos on YouTube: “Like there’s this one guy, staring straight at the screen!” says Fazer. “Silence… and then he just goes, ‘Fuck N-Dubz! Fuck Dappy! Fuck Fazer! Fuck Tulisa!’” He laughs. Does that bother you? “No. It’s like, where we were bought up, if there’s a drug dealer that’s doing very successful for himself, people are going to hate on him, too.”
We then discuss the true extent of Dappy’s naughtiness, which, he insists, is talked-up by the tabloid press. “I am a spontaneous guy and you only live once, and…” So how much of it is true? “Half of it.” For example: “Like the story where we got kicked out of [a hotel at] Alton Towers.” (”N-Dubz Dappy Is Puff Baddie!” The Sun, 30 April 2010.) So it didn’t happen? I ask. “No, it did.” How? And, why? “Erm… someone was allegedly smoking, in a non-smoking room, and so they asked us to leave.” And you accepted that? “Yes, sir! It’s a family hotel! But the paparazzi were outside, took the pictures, effed off in the car. We wanted to chase them! But… we didn’t.”
Well, it probably wouldn’t have been the most sensible move to make, I suggest.
“Yes, it would! It would have been very sensible!” says Dappy.
I meet N-Dubz again one week later, at a private airfield in Toulon, where they are filming the video for their new single, “Best Behaviour”. This is a lament on the twisted nature of fame, on the flawed logic of embracing the adoration of vast quantities of fans while forsaking a truer relationship with one person. The video mainly involves a lot of mournful disembarking from a private jet, some lonely clattering around a beautiful house high in the hills of Provence and the wielding of a great deal of Louis Vuitton luggage. “When you gonna save me, baby?” sings Dappy, spreading his arms out wide, then crossing them over his chest, while his on-screen love interest dives into the swimming pool behind him and attempts to reach him through the aquarium-like dividing glass wall.
What’s the story behind the video? I ask Ben Peters, the director. “Do you want a really deep and conceptual answer to that?” he says. “Or can I just say bling?”
Filming is an interminable process. The hold-ups are myriad and unexplained; N-Dubz endure it with wearied resignation and occasional blow-ups. Dappy’s pregnant girlfriend, Kaye, is on set, along with Gino, his son. Dappy plays with Gino; he is uncharacteristically calm in his family’s company. But he also appears to have developed a new catchphrase – “We beat the system!” – which he applies to anything from the dodging of an early on-set call time to surviving an ill-advised jump from the roof of a location house into the swimming pool. “Daddy beat the system, GG!” he tells his son, apropos of something or other.
Elsewhere: Tulisa wears a coral kaftan and sleeps between takes; she requires considerable quantities of pizza to be shipped in (she won’t eat anything else). Fazer amuses himself quietly in corners and is delighted to discover that Tulisa’s buff, video love interest extra can’t swim that well.
I talk sartorial reinvention with Dappy and Fazer’s stylist, who aches to get both of them into trousers that aren’t two sizes too wide and long. I witness Dappy erupting when he discovers there is to be no more food on set that day. “On our last video,” he screams, “there was salads and everything!”
He and I end up loitering in an antechamber together; I grab the opportunity to ask him if he’s backing either of the Miliband brothers in the Labour leadership election battle.
“Who’s that then, darling?” he asks.
David and Ed Miliband?
“Never heard of them, darling.”
Oh, but I think you all went to the same school. Not at that same time, but still…
“Who again?”
I google them on my iPhone and show Dappy the image results.
He shakes his head.
“Sorry, darling. I don’t know them.”
But you’re a Labour supporter?
“Very much so, darling! I liked Gordon. I could have done with more Gordon.”
Not a fan of Cameron’s, then?
“I hate David Cameron,” Dappy says, and tells me why in terms so libellous that they can’t be printed.
We talk about the future of N-Dubz. Dappy expects that, eventually, he and Tulisa will work independently of each other on solo efforts and that Fazer will write and produce for other artists. He says he has plans for his own fashion line: “Na Na Wear! You’re going to get trousers and everything.” Is he rich? I ask. “Am I rich? I think I am! A little bit. Money makes it easier and there’s no point saying it doesn’t.” On a personal level, he says that his domestic arrangements – his revitalised relationship with Kaye and her pregnancy – have settled him. “Although… there are all these other pretty girls! I could get into trouble! But I try not to.”
I leave N-Dubz in the midst of the private airfield in France. They clamber on and off the jet they’ve hired for this scene, in line with the director’s instructions, hefting the Louis Vuitton luggage, singing the hook to “Best Behaviour”. They wave me off and thank me for coming; they are a fantastically courteous bunch of celebrities, perhaps the most civil I’ve met. “You’ve got to be polite, in’t you darling?” Dappy told me, back in London. “You’ve got to have manners.”
You have, Dappy, I thought at the time. You really have. Now, I think: you wouldn’t necessarily turn to N-Dubz first for life lessons. And yet N-Dubz are grafters and also dedicated, loyal, authentic, unspoiled by success, ingenuous, unexpectedly kind, inadvertently funny and, yes, really very polite. All in all, you could do a lot worse.

Dappy projects his small, wiry Anglo-Greek Cypriot self into an east London photographic studio at a little under a billion miles an hour. “Hello!” he shouts, his face only inches away from mine. “Hello, darling!”


Dino Contostavlos is 23 years old, very loud and, yes, really very small. He’s instant. An intense, irrepressible, busy and bossy, inescapably charming springer spaniel of a human. “Hello Dappy,” I say. He shakes my hand vigorously and kisses me on the cheek, then bounces off to inspect the far reaches of the studio. The air in the room, which had until that point been calm, composed and perhaps somewhat stagnant, is violently resuscitated by his presence.


“Where is everybody?” he shouts. I shrug; I was hoping he could tell me.


Dappy is an hour-and-a-half late for our interview, but his bandmates – his cousin Tulisa (Tula Contostavlos, 22), and his best friend Fazer (Richard Rawson, 23) – are later still.


Dappy tsks his annoyance. “Where the fuck are they?” He turns to me. He looks distraught. “I’m so sorry, darling! This is so embarrassing!” He runs to the studio door and shouts: “Fazer? Fazer! Let’s go, let’s go, let’s go! T! Ready? Ready, T? Ready? Come on! People are waiting!” A minute passes and then Fazer and Tulisa materialise. They enter the room in a less explosive manner: Fazer (all Gucci and appraising sideways glances) is mid-text. Tulisa (dollish, glossy, watchful) walks gingerly in vertiginous heels.


So there they are: N-Dubz. The hip-hop/R&B/multi-platform pop culture sensation. They’ve got a devoted fan base, two triple-platinum albums, seven top 20 singles, three sell-out tours, one bestselling book and Being N-Dubz, a massively successful Channel 4 documentary series, under their belt.


In other news: they’ve experienced not inconsiderable bother with the law, developed a tricky relationship with the tabloid press and clocked up what is, to date, the only celebrity association with the recently banned drug miaow miaow (in April, Dappy was caught on film ingesting methadrone – miaow miaow – in a nightclub, much to the delight of the Sun). That’s without touching on a kiss-and-tell story (again, all Dappy’s work) and the somewhat difficult coda to an interview on Radio 1’s Chris Moyles Show: Dappy took the mobile phone number of an unappreciative texter and began sending her death threats.


Despite which – or, possibly, because of which – when N-Dubz range around me and grin, I am overwhelmed with good feeling towards them.


In a pop scene dominated by the saccharine, the sterile, the X-Factored and the media trained, N-Dubz are a raging, sporadically illegal, unrefined, imperfect and beautiful anomaly. They are authentic, outspoken and raw – and no one saw them coming.


They were formed 11 years ago by Dappy’s father, Byron Contostavlos: “Uncle B! Yeah! It was Uncle B who put us together.” Contostavlos was a musician (formerly of Mungo Jerry) turned Camden Town barber. He wanted to protect his son, niece and Fazer and inspire them, keep them on the straight and narrow from which they were showing signs of veering, with enthusiasm.


As kids, Dappy, Tulisa and Fazer had an impoverished and harsh upbringing in north London. All three attended Haverstock Hill comprehensive in Chalk Farm, a school that had churned out David and Ed Miliband 15 years earlier. But it is fair to say that N-Dubz’s experience of growing up was not especially Milibandesque. Gangs, drugs, criminality and bad behaviour defined their youth. They were shaped by the toughness of their environment, they embraced and revelled in it. They do still, to a degree: the name N-Dubz is a contraction of the Camden postcode, NW1; the bad behaviour remains part of their shtick.


“We were naughty!” says Dappy, with relish. “Me and Fazer, we used to go out on the streets and cause madness.”


“Me and Dappy were on the wrong path,” confirms Fazer. He pauses, solemnly. He isn’t afraid of grand utterances. “Music is the saviour for us.”


“We could have went: bam! Prison, stabbed, jail, shot, finished!” adds Dappy. He claps his hands together to emphasise each word.


It took N-Dubz eight years to break through. Uncle B scraped together money with which to hire studio space and pay for three white-label albums. He entered the band into talent competitions: “We won a lot of them!” says Dappy.


“We won all of them!” says Fazer.


“Well, there were only, like, one or two,” says Tulisa. She sits quietly; she lets the men talk and chips in only if you ask her something directly or she needs to correct Dappy.


“Three! Three or four!” Fazer protests.


“It was one,” Tulisa tells me. She sighs. “Or two.”


“And they promised us the world! Superstardom!” says Dappy. “But… nothing.”


Still, they persevered. They wrote, they gigged, they recorded, they had meetings with record company execs. No one signed them; progress was slow. You were young, I say. That demonstrated a great deal of dedication and discipline.


“All that dedication and discipline was Uncle B,” says Dappy. “All of it.”


N-Dubz gained a significant fan base while still unsigned and underground; their self-released videos received airplay on urban digital channel Channel U. But in 2007 they began to receive mainstream attention. In November of that year, following exposure on YouTube and spiralling viral support, they were awarded a Mobo for best newcomer. This brought them to the attention of Polydor, which rereleased their single “You Better Not Waste My Time”, taking it to No 26 in the charts. Things were looking up.


And then, suddenly, Uncle B died.


I can’t imagine how painful that must have been, I say. For all of you, but for Dappy specifically. To lose your mentor, your manager. Your father.


“Yes, but that was when it blew!” says Dappy. His tone doesn’t vary; he’s still excitable, bouncy, silly, inclined to segue off on wild conversational tangents. “The night after he died, we was on stage, in front of 2,000 people. Crying. Crying on stage!”


Had he been ill for a while?


“He knew he had a problem inside him. He could feel it. He had bronchitis in his lungs. Infect, infect, blocked artery…” Dappy makes a comedy choking noise, squeezes his own throat. “Gone!”


So it was a sudden death as far as you were concerned?


“He died, with the remote control in his hand, watching Channel U.”


“Waiting for our video,” says Fazer.


“Waiting for our video. I gave him mouth to mouth.” Dappy demonstrates.


So, wait. Dappy, you found your father’s body?


“Yes! Mouth to mouth, knocked on his head! His head was blue! Cold!”


He stops. I look at the “RIP Dad” tattoo on Dappy’s neck. A week later, when I join the band on a video shoot in the south of France, I overhear him telling the video director that he needs to be shot from a certain angle because “it shows the Dad tattoo better”. I know that the band’s breakthrough album, 2008’s Uncle B, and their sixth single, “Papa Can You Hear Me?”, were both dedicated to Byron Contostavlos. Dappy’s grief is opaque and coded and discordantly intertwined with the earliest stages of N-Dubz’s success.


It has been a little over three years since Uncle B died, and a little over two and a half since the band began securing hits and growing their fan base exponentially via Being N-Dubz, the Channel 4 documentary devoted to them. They were dropped by Polydor but soon re-signed to All Around the World, a subsidiary of the same parent company, Universal. No one can tell me exactly how much N-Dubz are currently worth, although Rich Castillo, one of their managers, guesses it’s around the £2m mark. “They keep 80% of the money, because they write and produce everything themselves.” (”And then they go and spend it all on jewellery,” a member of their entourage whispers later.)


Their music has tipped them into ubiquity through the course of 2010. If you think you don’t know N-Dubz’s songs, you’re completely wrong. You do. It’s that gimmicky, hyper-commercial blend of R&B and hip-hop with a grimy edge – the one with the contrasting hard and raw lyrical motifs that cover crack deals, Facebook stalking and unwanted pregnancies. It’s as buoyant, irrepressible and infectious as Dappy – and it is playing out on any radio station remotely interested in snaring a teenage demographic. You’ll know it by Dappy’s recurring “Na na, na-ay” and by Tulisa’s cod-operatic warblings.


So, I say, you lot are famous!


“Yes!” says Dappy. And: “Wow!”


“Wow!” says Fazer. “Our dreams come true!”


“Thing is,” says Tulisa, the voice of pragmatism, “we haven’t had time to register it. We’ve just come back from America, from LA, and stuff, where we’re not really known yet, so…”


Yet? You expect that to change?


“Oh, soon we’ll be the biggest…” says Dappy.


“Huge,” offers Fazer.


“Oh, yeah. We’ll be big over there.”


“Four hundred per cent,” says Fazer. “Four hundred per cent.”


Which might even turn out to be the case. N-Dubz are signed to Def Jam in the US, a label that counts Kanye West, Justin Bieber and Rihanna among its artists. In November, the band will release their first single on Def Jam. They’re vague on their precise strategy for breaking the US, but as far as I can work out, it revolves around elocution lessons and not using “innit” as a lyric any more. “Or ‘You get me’!” says Fazer. “Or ‘dahn’ when we mean ‘down’. Other people around the world, if we say, ‘Get dahn!’, well, they’re going to say, ‘What’s he talking about?’”


“And also because we’ve got a vision, a global vision, and we know where we’re going in our global vision,” says Dappy. “And because me and Tulisa have stopped the arguing and the crap…”


Oh, but hang on: you’ve stopped the arguing? I say. Dappy and Tulisa’s fights are epic, the main narrative strand in the Being N-Dubz documentaries.


“We made a pact,” says Tulisa. “Ten years of arguing is enough. We’ve stopped. It’s been a month, now.”


And that’s it? (I’m disappointed; I’d hoped to witness one in the flesh.)


“I did a Dappy tattoo, as a pact of goodwill,” she says. She leans forward and sweeps her super-long hair extensions off her shoulders. The base of her neck reads “Dappy”.


“D. A. P. P. Y.,” says Fazer, helpfully.


“Now every time she sees I’m being naughty, she goes like…” Dappy tips his head forward. “And I’m like: ooooh!” He emits a high-pitched, fearful scream. Tulisa smiles a satisfied smile.


I am intrigued by Tula Constostavlos. Dappy is preposterously charismatic, and Fazer is a competent sidekick, but Tulisa is a truly interesting proposition, rare by anyone’s standards. She looks like the definitive R&B glamour piece: all sparkle, cleavage-encasing cocktail dresses and heavy makeup on a pretty face. I’d initially assumed she was window dressing, but later I’d begun to understand the extent of the power she wields over her bandmates and how central and defining a part of the proceedings she was.


And then I watched Tulisa: My Mum and Me, a BBC3 documentary which revealed that, aged 11, Tulisa had become the primary carer for her mother, Anne, who suffers from an extreme mood disorder, an intense combination of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.


In the film, Tulisa talked dispassionately about watching her mother being sectioned for the first time when Tulisa was five; about how the stress of the situation had pushed her to self-harm, to eating disorders, to depression. She explained that she had attempted suicide twice before she was 18: she’d tried to overdose on pills at 14 and slashed her wrists three years later. Tulisa began writing songs as therapy at 11; Uncle B and N-Dubz became a refuge for her. When I ask her where she’d be without N-Dubz, she says, steadily: “It would be suicide. I don’t want to go on and bring it all back to the depression, but… I would not be here. Let’s say that.”


We cover vast swaths of ground during our 40-minute chat. Dappy’s undisciplined ramblings power us into bizarre territory. We address N-Dubz’s experience of celebrity. There are the girls: “I’m not going to lie,” says Dappy. “When we first got famous, using our music to get girls and shit. Long time ago. Not any more.” No? “No! I’ve got a wife!” Or rather a long-term, if on-and-off, girlfriend, Kaye Vassell, with whom he has an 18-month-old son. “Yeah. I got one kid, one on the way. Fazer’s got five. Ha ha! No! No, he hasn’t. He hasn’t got any.”


And there are the other perks of fame: the discounts. “Twenty-five per cent off a car, just because you’re famous!” says Tulisa. “The more money you make, the less you have to pay for things.” Which is peculiar? “It is. It is.”


“People who can afford stuff and it’s free! And those that can’t, it’s a higher price! It should be the other way round,” says Fazer.


You’re socialists?


“Ha! Yeah,” says Tulisa. “Although I ain’t feeling the 50% tax bracket.”


We address the fans, who are staggeringly devoted. “I saw one, with a tattoo… of my face! My face! On someone’s arm,” says Dappy. How was that? “Oh, great! It’s absolutely great!”


“I’ve had the whole of Fulham youth club outside my house for a week,” reveals Fazer, obscurely.


And we address the haters, the people who post videos on YouTube: “Like there’s this one guy, staring straight at the screen!” says Fazer. “Silence… and then he just goes, ‘Fuck N-Dubz! Fuck Dappy! Fuck Fazer! Fuck Tulisa!’” He laughs. Does that bother you? “No. It’s like, where we were bought up, if there’s a drug dealer that’s doing very successful for himself, people are going to hate on him, too.”


We then discuss the true extent of Dappy’s naughtiness, which, he insists, is talked-up by the tabloid press. “I am a spontaneous guy and you only live once, and…” So how much of it is true? “Half of it.” For example: “Like the story where we got kicked out of [a hotel at] Alton Towers.” (”N-Dubz Dappy Is Puff Baddie!” The Sun, 30 April 2010.) So it didn’t happen? I ask. “No, it did.” How? And, why? “Erm… someone was allegedly smoking, in a non-smoking room, and so they asked us to leave.” And you accepted that? “Yes, sir! It’s a family hotel! But the paparazzi were outside, took the pictures, effed off in the car. We wanted to chase them! But… we didn’t.”


Well, it probably wouldn’t have been the most sensible move to make, I suggest.


“Yes, it would! It would have been very sensible!” says Dappy.


I meet N-Dubz again one week later, at a private airfield in Toulon, where they are filming the video for their new single, “Best Behaviour”. This is a lament on the twisted nature of fame, on the flawed logic of embracing the adoration of vast quantities of fans while forsaking a truer relationship with one person. The video mainly involves a lot of mournful disembarking from a private jet, some lonely clattering around a beautiful house high in the hills of Provence and the wielding of a great deal of Louis Vuitton luggage. “When you gonna save me, baby?” sings Dappy, spreading his arms out wide, then crossing them over his chest, while his on-screen love interest dives into the swimming pool behind him and attempts to reach him through the aquarium-like dividing glass wall.


What’s the story behind the video? I ask Ben Peters, the director. “Do you want a really deep and conceptual answer to that?” he says. “Or can I just say bling?”


Filming is an interminable process. The hold-ups are myriad and unexplained; N-Dubz endure it with wearied resignation and occasional blow-ups. Dappy’s pregnant girlfriend, Kaye, is on set, along with Gino, his son. Dappy plays with Gino; he is uncharacteristically calm in his family’s company. But he also appears to have developed a new catchphrase – “We beat the system!” – which he applies to anything from the dodging of an early on-set call time to surviving an ill-advised jump from the roof of a location house into the swimming pool. “Daddy beat the system, GG!” he tells his son, apropos of something or other.


Elsewhere: Tulisa wears a coral kaftan and sleeps between takes; she requires considerable quantities of pizza to be shipped in (she won’t eat anything else). Fazer amuses himself quietly in corners and is delighted to discover that Tulisa’s buff, video love interest extra can’t swim that well.


I talk sartorial reinvention with Dappy and Fazer’s stylist, who aches to get both of them into trousers that aren’t two sizes too wide and long. I witness Dappy erupting when he discovers there is to be no more food on set that day. “On our last video,” he screams, “there was salads and everything!”


He and I end up loitering in an antechamber together; I grab the opportunity to ask him if he’s backing either of the Miliband brothers in the Labour leadership election battle.


“Who’s that then, darling?” he asks.


David and Ed Miliband?


“Never heard of them, darling.”


Oh, but I think you all went to the same school. Not at that same time, but still…


“Who again?”


I google them on my iPhone and show Dappy the image results.


He shakes his head.


“Sorry, darling. I don’t know them.”


But you’re a Labour supporter?


“Very much so, darling! I liked Gordon. I could have done with more Gordon.”


Not a fan of Cameron’s, then?


“I hate David Cameron,” Dappy says, and tells me why in terms so libellous that they can’t be printed.


We talk about the future of N-Dubz. Dappy expects that, eventually, he and Tulisa will work independently of each other on solo efforts and that Fazer will write and produce for other artists. He says he has plans for his own fashion line: “Na Na Wear! You’re going to get trousers and everything.” Is he rich? I ask. “Am I rich? I think I am! A little bit. Money makes it easier and there’s no point saying it doesn’t.” On a personal level, he says that his domestic arrangements – his revitalised relationship with Kaye and her pregnancy – have settled him. “Although… there are all these other pretty girls! I could get into trouble! But I try not to.”


I leave N-Dubz in the midst of the private airfield in France. They clamber on and off the jet they’ve hired for this scene, in line with the director’s instructions, hefting the Louis Vuitton luggage, singing the hook to “Best Behaviour”. They wave me off and thank me for coming; they are a fantastically courteous bunch of celebrities, perhaps the most civil I’ve met. “You’ve got to be polite, in’t you darling?” Dappy told me, back in London. “You’ve got to have manners.”


You have, Dappy, I thought at the time. You really have. Now, I think: you wouldn’t necessarily turn to N-Dubz first for life lessons. And yet N-Dubz are grafters and also dedicated, loyal, authentic, unspoiled by success, ingenuous, unexpectedly kind, inadvertently funny and, yes, really very polite. All in all, you could do a lot worse.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/sep/05/n-dubz-interview

Laura Marling: the Mercurial rise

September 6, 2010  Filed under howie wang  

(The Guardian)

Two albums, two Mercury Prize nominations and she’s still only 20… Laura Marling on her new-found confidence, the folk resurgence and competing with her boyfriend Marcus Mumford

Laura-Marling-with-MUMFOR-006

When I later walked past her outside some Portaloos, I found myself gauchely telling her she’d been wonderful. Now, as I meet her in her local, a small west London pub, I confess to this previous, brief encounter and watch her blue-green eyes widen in patient surprise. I’d interrupted her eating a bowl of noodles, I add, by way of an apology. “Oh how glamorous,” she says dryly.
The truth is that the woman sitting in front of me – sipping black coffee, smoking, clad in a camel coat and exuding a ghostly sort of radiance – is nothing if not glamorous. Soignee to the point of actressy, maintaining eye contact with a coolly intense gaze, she is an entirely different being from the desperately shy teenager that put out Alas I Cannot Swim two years ago.
When she toured that album – a Mercury- nominated debut credited with spear- heading an indie-folk revival, and a bewilderingly precocious achievement considering she wrote it aged 16 – her stare would be resolutely fastened on a spot just in front of her feet. It was often painful to watch, as she readily admits.
So where has her newfound ease come from? Partly from growing up – she’s 20 now – but also, “because I really considered the fact that if people have come to see a gig, it’s actually part of my… role as an entertainer,” she over-enunciates the words parodically, “to show my gratitude to them for being there and to stop making them feel like they’re slightly intruding on something.”
That sense of intrusion, or at least of acute intimacy, is very much there on her second album, I Speak Because I Can – a bolder and fuller record than the first. Though many of its songs are spun by adopted personae (the title track, for example, is written as Penelope, waiting for Odysseus to return) it has the power, like that searing wintry gaze of hers, to cut right to the core. There are few songwriters around at the moment who can match Marling for emotional intensity.
Unsurprisingly, writing songs (”a mixture of self-flagellation and therapy”) comes easiest when she’s unhappy. Which must present her with a bit of a paradox. Does it mean that she… “Goes looking for it?” she laughs, finishing the sentence. “It’s the same reason I don’t take drugs,” she says. “Life is hard enough.” Does she drink, though? “Oh yeah. Hell, yeah,” she gives a low chuckle. “But I don’t think you have to look very far to find something to make you feel a bit low. Maybe one day when I’m perfectly happy I won’t write another song, but I don’t think we’re in any danger of that.”
If not perfectly happy, she certainly seems extraordinarily comfortable in her skin. She admits “when I started doing this I spent too much time making sure that people didn’t make me do things I didn’t want to do.” She was a contrary teenager, making what she terms “anti-points”, the most obvious of which was not ever appearing in make-up – she’d doggedly wipe it all off before she went on stage or TV. “And that’s all well and good until you travel loads and get off a plane looking like the back end of a bus.” (At this point it’s worth saying that she is indeed wearing mascara and a tiny bit of blusher, and very lovely she looks with it, too.)
There’s a grander explanation for this concession to cosmetics, though: “Womanhood is something you don’t consider until it hits you,” she says. “At first I was intimidated by it and then I felt empowered by it.” It also found her “going into a shop and picking up a baggy T-shirt in one hand and a dress in the other and going [she puts on a mock-existential-crisis voice] ‘Who am I?’” Now, clad in an outfit that falls somewhere between those two ends of the spectrum, she adds: “I definitely know my place in the world a lot better, which makes everything a lot easier.”
Except, apparently, her fear of death, which has got worse. “Flying becomes a bit difficult,” she explains wearily, “travelling becomes a bit difficult, drinking a bottle of water that’s already been opened becomes a little bit difficult. It’s a funny old thing.” She takes a drag of her cigarette. “Not crippling but… apparent. You consider your own significance…” But when most 20-year-olds freak out, I venture, they don’t have two Mercury Prize nominations to assure them of their significance. (Marling is in the running again at this year’s awards for I Speak Because I Can; the winner is announced on Tuesday.)
“Does that make you significant?” she muses. “I don’t know. Well… maybe in some respects. It’s made me feel very happy. And scared. It’s made me feel very alive, I guess.” She pauses, looks thoughtful and says slowly, “I don’t really understand awards…” before hastily adding that she’s honoured to be nominated. “And nice for my parents to have something to show… or whatever. Everyone gets given a little statue to say that they were nominated and I gave that straight to my parents so they’ll have another one.”
When she talks about not winning last time round – Manchester favourites Elbow triumphed, to almost unanimous delight – there seems to be a sense of relief. “When they were about to announce it I did think I won’t be able to stand up if they say my name. In retrospect, it was probably pretty good that I didn’t [win], because my career would have taken a very different turn.”
Marling’s boyfriend is Marcus Mumford of folk-pop outfit Mumford & Sons, who are also Mercury-nominated this year. Like her, they are often stuck in the “nu-folk” bracket. Unsurprisingly, it’s a term that makes her shudder (”anything with ‘nu’ in front of it is pretty unforgiv, isn’t it?”), but in her case it seems particularly inappropriate since both her music and personality appear so rooted in the past and its traditions.
She admits she “didn’t get” popular culture as a teenager; it’s only her incipient feminism that’s dissuaded her from wanting to live in a Jane Austen novel (”I don’t think I’d want to be a woman held back by her generation, that’s not ideal.”) And her ideal day off is “a nice café and a crossword”. “I think I’m quite… not prudish in an extreme way but… I think I quite like things to be polite and elegant.”
Since old-fashioned manners are important to her, I wonder what etiquette dictates when your boyfriend is up for the same award. Is she going to find that strange on the night? “I think it will be really funny. Not funny. You know… It’s really bizarre. I just can’t believe it.” She looks uncomfortable. Asking Marling about her boyfriends feels a bit like asking the Queen about her bowel movements: indecorous. Particularly since her relationship and break up with Charlie Fink, front man of Noah and the Whale, was so pored over when his band released The First Days of Spring last year, on which Fink sings: “I have nothing, I have no one/ I’ve been so quickly set free.”
Her graciousness, reserve and odd British quaintness are typified in the little she has to say on this subject: “I did hear the album, which I thought was stunning, a testament to their talent as a band. I’ve always thought those chaps are brilliant.” And, she adds, “When it came out I didn’t read any newspapers, aside from the crossword, of course.”
If she weren’t such an old soul – humane, thoughtful and best of all, obdurately herself – her occasional moments of queenliness (she’s capable of making statements like, “I do worry about the depreciation of the character, the individual” and “I think there’s a goodness in most people that just needs a bit of awakening”) would be faintly risible. As it is, they’re endearing. So too is her admission that, “in these past two years I’ve found it amazing, fascinating, completely new to me to really engage with people.”
Needless to say, she’s fixing me with a very intent gaze as she says this. “That’s something that, because of low self-esteem or lack of self-confidence maybe, I didn’t think was possible.” And then, ramping up her already clipped vowels to a Penelope Keith level of ridiculous-posh she declares: “You can never be alone with the art of conversation.”
What a delight to know that as thoughtful a young woman as they come, and one who’s already staked her place in the pantheon of great British female folk singers, is more than capable than taking the piss out of herself.

Laura Marling’s set at Glastonbury this summer must have been the most serene festival performance of the year. Chatting wryly between song after spine-tinglingly perfect song, she was so composed and quietly assured that, at certain points, you could sense a collective swoon.

When I later walked past her outside some Portaloos, I found myself gauchely telling her she’d been wonderful. Now, as I meet her in her local, a small west London pub, I confess to this previous, brief encounter and watch her blue-green eyes widen in patient surprise. I’d interrupted her eating a bowl of noodles, I add, by way of an apology. “Oh how glamorous,” she says dryly.

The truth is that the woman sitting in front of me – sipping black coffee, smoking, clad in a camel coat and exuding a ghostly sort of radiance – is nothing if not glamorous. Soignee to the point of actressy, maintaining eye contact with a coolly intense gaze, she is an entirely different being from the desperately shy teenager that put out Alas I Cannot Swim two years ago.

When she toured that album – a Mercury- nominated debut credited with spear- heading an indie-folk revival, and a bewilderingly precocious achievement considering she wrote it aged 16 – her stare would be resolutely fastened on a spot just in front of her feet. It was often painful to watch, as she readily admits.

So where has her newfound ease come from? Partly from growing up – she’s 20 now – but also, “because I really considered the fact that if people have come to see a gig, it’s actually part of my… role as an entertainer,” she over-enunciates the words parodically, “to show my gratitude to them for being there and to stop making them feel like they’re slightly intruding on something.”

That sense of intrusion, or at least of acute intimacy, is very much there on her second album, I Speak Because I Can – a bolder and fuller record than the first. Though many of its songs are spun by adopted personae (the title track, for example, is written as Penelope, waiting for Odysseus to return) it has the power, like that searing wintry gaze of hers, to cut right to the core. There are few songwriters around at the moment who can match Marling for emotional intensity.

Unsurprisingly, writing songs (”a mixture of self-flagellation and therapy”) comes easiest when she’s unhappy. Which must present her with a bit of a paradox. Does it mean that she… “Goes looking for it?” she laughs, finishing the sentence. “It’s the same reason I don’t take drugs,” she says. “Life is hard enough.” Does she drink, though? “Oh yeah. Hell, yeah,” she gives a low chuckle. “But I don’t think you have to look very far to find something to make you feel a bit low. Maybe one day when I’m perfectly happy I won’t write another song, but I don’t think we’re in any danger of that.”

If not perfectly happy, she certainly seems extraordinarily comfortable in her skin. She admits “when I started doing this I spent too much time making sure that people didn’t make me do things I didn’t want to do.” She was a contrary teenager, making what she terms “anti-points”, the most obvious of which was not ever appearing in make-up – she’d doggedly wipe it all off before she went on stage or TV. “And that’s all well and good until you travel loads and get off a plane looking like the back end of a bus.” (At this point it’s worth saying that she is indeed wearing mascara and a tiny bit of blusher, and very lovely she looks with it, too.)

There’s a grander explanation for this concession to cosmetics, though: “Womanhood is something you don’t consider until it hits you,” she says. “At first I was intimidated by it and then I felt empowered by it.” It also found her “going into a shop and picking up a baggy T-shirt in one hand and a dress in the other and going [she puts on a mock-existential-crisis voice] ‘Who am I?’” Now, clad in an outfit that falls somewhere between those two ends of the spectrum, she adds: “I definitely know my place in the world a lot better, which makes everything a lot easier.”

Except, apparently, her fear of death, which has got worse. “Flying becomes a bit difficult,” she explains wearily, “travelling becomes a bit difficult, drinking a bottle of water that’s already been opened becomes a little bit difficult. It’s a funny old thing.” She takes a drag of her cigarette. “Not crippling but… apparent. You consider your own significance…” But when most 20-year-olds freak out, I venture, they don’t have two Mercury Prize nominations to assure them of their significance. (Marling is in the running again at this year’s awards for I Speak Because I Can; the winner is announced on Tuesday.)

“Does that make you significant?” she muses. “I don’t know. Well… maybe in some respects. It’s made me feel very happy. And scared. It’s made me feel very alive, I guess.” She pauses, looks thoughtful and says slowly, “I don’t really understand awards…” before hastily adding that she’s honoured to be nominated. “And nice for my parents to have something to show… or whatever. Everyone gets given a little statue to say that they were nominated and I gave that straight to my parents so they’ll have another one.”

When she talks about not winning last time round – Manchester favourites Elbow triumphed, to almost unanimous delight – there seems to be a sense of relief. “When they were about to announce it I did think I won’t be able to stand up if they say my name. In retrospect, it was probably pretty good that I didn’t [win], because my career would have taken a very different turn.”

Marling’s boyfriend is Marcus Mumford of folk-pop outfit Mumford & Sons, who are also Mercury-nominated this year. Like her, they are often stuck in the “nu-folk” bracket. Unsurprisingly, it’s a term that makes her shudder (”anything with ‘nu’ in front of it is pretty unforgiv, isn’t it?”), but in her case it seems particularly inappropriate since both her music and personality appear so rooted in the past and its traditions.

She admits she “didn’t get” popular culture as a teenager; it’s only her incipient feminism that’s dissuaded her from wanting to live in a Jane Austen novel (”I don’t think I’d want to be a woman held back by her generation, that’s not ideal.”) And her ideal day off is “a nice café and a crossword”. “I think I’m quite… not prudish in an extreme way but… I think I quite like things to be polite and elegant.”

Since old-fashioned manners are important to her, I wonder what etiquette dictates when your boyfriend is up for the same award. Is she going to find that strange on the night? “I think it will be really funny. Not funny. You know… It’s really bizarre. I just can’t believe it.” She looks uncomfortable. Asking Marling about her boyfriends feels a bit like asking the Queen about her bowel movements: indecorous. Particularly since her relationship and break up with Charlie Fink, front man of Noah and the Whale, was so pored over when his band released The First Days of Spring last year, on which Fink sings: “I have nothing, I have no one/ I’ve been so quickly set free.”

Her graciousness, reserve and odd British quaintness are typified in the little she has to say on this subject: “I did hear the album, which I thought was stunning, a testament to their talent as a band. I’ve always thought those chaps are brilliant.” And, she adds, “When it came out I didn’t read any newspapers, aside from the crossword, of course.”

If she weren’t such an old soul – humane, thoughtful and best of all, obdurately herself – her occasional moments of queenliness (she’s capable of making statements like, “I do worry about the depreciation of the character, the individual” and “I think there’s a goodness in most people that just needs a bit of awakening”) would be faintly risible. As it is, they’re endearing. So too is her admission that, “in these past two years I’ve found it amazing, fascinating, completely new to me to really engage with people.”

Needless to say, she’s fixing me with a very intent gaze as she says this. “That’s something that, because of low self-esteem or lack of self-confidence maybe, I didn’t think was possible.” And then, ramping up her already clipped vowels to a Penelope Keith level of ridiculous-posh she declares: “You can never be alone with the art of conversation.”

What a delight to know that as thoughtful a young woman as they come, and one who’s already staked her place in the pantheon of great British female folk singers, is more than capable than taking the piss out of herself.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/sep/05/laura-marling-mercury-prize-marcus-mumford

Guns N’ Roses v Reading and Leeds festival: round three

September 3, 2010  Filed under howie wang  

(The Guardian)

Axl Rose continues his war with festival organisers, insisting on Twitter that bosses were to blame for his band’s late start

Axl-Rose-from-Guns-N-Rose-006

Days after Guns N’ Roses’ curtailed sets at Reading and Leeds, Axl Rose is still berating festival organisers for ignoring “the natural flow of events”. Having already demanded an apology from bosses who cut short his band’s performances, the singer is now trying a different tack. “Why book us?” he asked. “If we’re not wanted … we’re fine with going elsewhere.”
Rose’s latest tweeted comments are an escalation from those earlier this week, when he claimed to have had a “deal in place” to play beyond the curfew. Now, the Guns N’ Roses chieftain has penned a tirade, running into several paragraphs, against organisers of the Leeds and Reading festivals, suggesting the interrupted shows were part of a plan “to line someone else’s pockets or for fictitious tabloid fodder”. “Having the fans of our show penalised for how the event was ran,” he wrote, “seems a bit draconian and more than unfair.” While there’s no more talk of the alleged “deal” – a claim organiser Melvin Benn has denied – Rose now maintains that the band was on time.
“Our start times at the Reading and Leeds festivals factually had nothing to do with us,” he wrote. Instead, he insists, the other bands played too long. “We went on within our contracted and documented changeover time-period … If you are aware of our changeover time, the average length of our show and the general nature of how these types of festivals run all of which are no big secrets … why book us?”
However, there are no reports of serious tardiness by Queens of the Stone Age, the band that performed before Guns N’ Roses on both nights. But at Reading, Guns N’ Roses’ first chords rang out 58 minutes after their scheduled start-time; at Leeds, 35 minutes. This doesn’t seem to bother Rose. “I didn’t organise, arrange, authorise, have knowledge of or was even consulted about … these shows til after the fact,” he said. Furthermore, by cutting short their set, Rose claims organisers jeopardised the safety of fans. “Why … risk having it go bad for everyone?” he wrote. “That’s where true recklessness and negligence at both the fans and our expense would seem to be.”
“God forbid we would force ourselves on anyone,” Rose later claimed. “It’s not that kinda party.” On Tuesday night, Guns N’ Roses played Belfast’s Odyssey Arena. The concert started 43 minutes late.

Days after Guns N’ Roses’ curtailed sets at Reading and Leeds, Axl Rose is still berating festival organisers for ignoring “the natural flow of events”. Having already demanded an apology from bosses who cut short his band’s performances, the singer is now trying a different tack. “Why book us?” he asked. “If we’re not wanted … we’re fine with going elsewhere.”


Rose’s latest tweeted comments are an escalation from those earlier this week, when he claimed to have had a “deal in place” to play beyond the curfew. Now, the Guns N’ Roses chieftain has penned a tirade, running into several paragraphs, against organisers of the Leeds and Reading festivals, suggesting the interrupted shows were part of a plan “to line someone else’s pockets or for fictitious tabloid fodder”. “Having the fans of our show penalised for how the event was ran,” he wrote, “seems a bit draconian and more than unfair.” While there’s no more talk of the alleged “deal” – a claim organiser Melvin Benn has denied – Rose now maintains that the band was on time.


“Our start times at the Reading and Leeds festivals factually had nothing to do with us,” he wrote. Instead, he insists, the other bands played too long. “We went on within our contracted and documented changeover time-period … If you are aware of our changeover time, the average length of our show and the general nature of how these types of festivals run all of which are no big secrets … why book us?”


However, there are no reports of serious tardiness by Queens of the Stone Age, the band that performed before Guns N’ Roses on both nights. But at Reading, Guns N’ Roses’ first chords rang out 58 minutes after their scheduled start-time; at Leeds, 35 minutes. This doesn’t seem to bother Rose. “I didn’t organise, arrange, authorise, have knowledge of or was even consulted about … these shows til after the fact,” he said. Furthermore, by cutting short their set, Rose claims organisers jeopardised the safety of fans. “Why … risk having it go bad for everyone?” he wrote. “That’s where true recklessness and negligence at both the fans and our expense would seem to be.”


“God forbid we would force ourselves on anyone,” Rose later claimed. “It’s not that kinda party.” On Tuesday night, Guns N’ Roses played Belfast’s Odyssey Arena. The concert started 43 minutes late.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/sep/02/guns-n-roses-reading-leeds

Apple Introduces Ping, Social-Networking for Music

September 2, 2010  Filed under howie wang  

(Rolling Stone)

197482_APPLE_IPAD

At a music-themed conference this afternoon in San Francisco, Apple CEO Steve Jobs has announced the company’s new line of iPods and a “social network for music,” called Ping, that will allow iTunes users to connect with their friends for music recommendations. Job described Ping, which will be available with the launch of iTunes 10 today, as “Facebook and Twitter meet iTunes.” He also brought out Coldplay’s Chris Martin to perform a solo piano rendition of “Viva La Vida,” a song Martin admitted owes much of its success to its placement in an Apple commercial, and a brand new track called “Wedding Bells.” “This is a new song, I’ve been working on it — it’s called “Coldplay 2.6,” Martin said. “It has a lot of new features. It features seven different kinds of chords. Even a new one that our closest rivals have no idea about.”
With a Facebook-like layout and a “scrobbling” system similar to Last.fm’s, Ping will allow friends on iTunes to see each other’s music tastes, concerts they’ll be attending and more. Apple also said they would ditch the compact disc in the iTunes logo, replacing it with a musical note encased in a blue circle. As for iPods, all three of Apple’s major models have new designs and features: the iPod Touch now comes with the “FaceTime” technology introduced on the iPhone 4, plus HD video recording and in-device video editing. The iPod Nano gains a touch screen, an FM radio and a pedometer. Finally, the iPod Shuffle now comes both with play buttons, as in earlier incarnations, and the VoiceOver technology that later replaced the buttons. All three of the updated iPods will become available next week. Jobs did not mention any new models or changes for the iPod Classic, leading Gizmodo to speculate that the old-school model and its scrolling wheel were finally being phased out. Which pre-conference rumors were not addressed? The long-discussed iTunes.com with “cloud-based” streaming technology, and 90-second song samples on iTunes.

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/17386/197482